A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the law laid down through the Supreme Court from the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority with the parent department from the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
4. Record shows that the petitioner has long been booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Despite the fact that the petitioner has obtained bail in People cases, it does, prima facie, create that the petitioner is susceptible to repeating the offence.
maintaining the conviction awarded to the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade of the accused has not been conducted but. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to choose advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image of your petitioner was widely circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity with the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance to the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and developed images. In addition to, the images shown to the media reveal that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity till he was set up for an identification parade. Making pictures of the accused publically, either by showing the same on the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or plan, would create doubt within the proceedings with the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there is not any prospect for that witness to begin to see the accused before going into the identification parade. The accused should not be shown into the witness in person or through any other mode, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or even the push or electronic media. Given the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
Reasonable grounds are offered over the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. While punishment in the read more alleged offence does not fall while in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nevertheless learned Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit of the petitioner as accused, therefore, case on the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steerage has been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be a person or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for that decision from the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all might be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted within an argument.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
Pakistani legal citations typically incorporate the year, court, and case number. Familiarizing yourself with this format will help you quickly Find the cases you need. Numerous free case regulation websites allow you to definitely search directly using citations.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners could look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration by the Court under Article 184 (3), has long been setting a precedent which allows for much much easier access into the public to strategy the superior courts as well as subordinate courts on environment related issues.
In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Finding reliable free case law sites may be challenging. Many websites need subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case law resources in Pakistan, providing you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.